Superman #27

Discussion

• 
  Hmives

  I appreciate what Tomasi and Gleason are going for with this one, but idk whether it being less on the nose would help or hinder the story. The art is also boring, not because of the artist but it's just the kents going from place to place not exciting really

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  MachoCamachoZ

  I really thought I was going to love this until the coexist panel hit... Just went downhill from there.

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  Blackpoll

  It felt like a public service announcement that would be given out in a grade school scholastics issue. Some of the humor was pretty good, but not much else.
  

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  Mel

  I really did not like this issue...and it's only part 1. Should have at best been a one shot

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  NerdHouse

  I liked this issue. Sure, it's not the usual Superman fare, but it had a nice message.
  

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  mrsergmeister

  Cool little "holiday special" issue...even though they are a little late with it. I agree with previous comments that though the message was good it was a little on the nose. Ive always loved the Kent family and how they interact with each other but this issue was weird and definitely seemed like filler. Jorge Jimenez's variant is amazing though!

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  SkitchNM

  This really should have been a one shot.  It was definitely a bit too much.  

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  GenesisX

  I liked it. I never heard of Deborah Sampson before, and I appreciated Supes' patriotic endeavors, especially when nowadays more people respect Russia than the constitution. 

  Reply  ·  3 years ago
• 
  ObliviousToRuin

  This did nothing for me. Surely there's a way of conveying this message without being so heavy-handed and patronising.

  Reply  ·  3 years ago